Miranda vs. Arizona (1966)
Background and Details
Numerous different defendants were asked by the courts if "while in custody or otherwise deprived of [their] freedom in any significant way." Many stated that while being interrogated or signing statements, they were not told about their rights to counsel and protection against self-incrimination.
Decision
5 votes for Miranda, 4 votes against. All criminals have the privilege against self-incrimination.
Precedent
Before arrest or interrogation, police must read the suspect their rights. This includes their right to remain silent, to have counsel, an appointed attorney, and more.
Numerous different defendants were asked by the courts if "while in custody or otherwise deprived of [their] freedom in any significant way." Many stated that while being interrogated or signing statements, they were not told about their rights to counsel and protection against self-incrimination.
Decision
5 votes for Miranda, 4 votes against. All criminals have the privilege against self-incrimination.
Precedent
Before arrest or interrogation, police must read the suspect their rights. This includes their right to remain silent, to have counsel, an appointed attorney, and more.